The National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare summarizes a cost effective strategy to save billions in Medicare expenses for beneficiaries and the federal government.
Price Negotiation Would Dramatically Lower the Cost of Prescription Drugs for Medicare Beneficiaries
“The National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare has long advocated for a government-administered Part D benefit with negotiated drug prices. However, a provision in the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA), known as the “noninterference” provision, expressly prohibits the Medicare program from directly negotiating lower prescription drug prices with pharmaceutical manufacturers. Today, over 3,000 private plans enter into negotiations with pharmaceutical manufacturers to deliver Medicare Part D benefits. Each plan tries to attract a large enough number of customers so they have more leverage to negotiate lower prices with manufacturers. Establishing Medicare as the collective buyer of prescription drugs – rather than thousands of individual private plans – would better harness the purchasing power of Medicare’s 43 million beneficiaries and substantially lower prices.
National Committee Position
The National Committee is committed to finding ways to improve the prescription drug law. One of the most significant improvements we can make is to allow the traditional Medicare program to offer its own government-administered Part D plan with drug prices negotiated directly with pharmaceutical manufacturers.
Medicare beneficiaries deserve the same low prices that veterans and others receive through negotiations between the federal government and drug companies. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) achieves significant discounts on generic and brand-name prescription drugs by negotiating directly with pharmaceutical manufacturers on behalf of its five million beneficiaries. One study by Congressional Budget Office (CBO) found that, on average, the VA pays only about 42 percent of the Average Wholesale Price (AWP) – or the suggested list price – for brand-name drugs.
While VA beneficiaries enjoy some of the best prices on prescription drugs negotiated by the federal government, other federal departments also receive significant discounts on prescription drugs through price negotiation. For example, CBO found that drug prices negotiated through the Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) are 53% of the AWP. FSS prices are available to all government agencies (including the VA, the Department of Defense, the Public Health Service, the Bureau of Prisons, and other federal agencies and institutions) when they purchase prescription drugs.
Seniors pay more for prescription drugs under Medicare Part D than veterans pay for prescription drugs under their federally-negotiated plan. One study by Families USA found that the VA negotiated substantially lower prices for the top 20 drugs used by seniors, compared to private Medicare Part D plans. Specifically, they found that the lowest VA price is lower than the lowest Medicare prescription drug plan price for 19 of the top 20 drugs. Based on an analysis of median prices, Families USA also found that the lowest price offered by any Medicare prescription drug plan is at least $260.70, or 48.2%, higher than the lowest price available through the VA.
Another study by the minority staff at the House Government Reform Committee found that drug prices under Medicare Part D’s private plans exceed federally-negotiated prices, Canadian prices, Drugstore.com prices, and Costco prices. Their study showed that the average prices offered by the ten leading private Medicare drug plans are 84% higher than federally negotiated prices (Federal Supply Schedule), 61% higher than Canadian prices, 3.5% higher than Drugstore.com prices, and 2.9% higher than Costco prices.
A Medicare-operated Part D plan with drug prices directly negotiated with pharmaceutical companies will deliver billions of dollars in savings. Research by respected economist Dean Baker shows that the federal government and Medicare beneficiaries would save $600 billion between 2006 and 2013 if Medicare were allowed to directly offer a Part D benefit and to negotiate prices with pharmaceutical manufacturers. Such significant savings could be used to close Part D’s donut hole and to lower cost-sharing for Medicare beneficiaries.
Medicare beneficiaries should be given the choice to get their prescription drug benefit from the traditional Medicare program that they know and trust. Instead, they are forced to deal with an overwhelming number of private plans with varying formularies, premiums, deductibles, and co-pays in order to receive prescription drug coverage. A Medicare-operated plan with negotiated drug prices will restore the social insurance nature of Medicare, deliver substantially lower prices, and give beneficiaries the Part D choice they really want.”
Medicare Advantage Plans Cost Medicare an Extra $34.1 Billion in 2012
Medicare Advantage program and its predecessors have cost the publicly funded program for the elderly and disabled an extra $282.6 billion since 1985, most of it over the past eight years. In 2012 alone, private insurers were overpaid $34.1 billion. … Continue reading →
States Refusing to Expand Medicaid Will Hurt Veterans
Via Sy Mukherjee -> “A new Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Urban Institute study concludes that states refusing to expand Medicaid will leave over 200,000 low-income, uninsured veterans and two-thirds of uninsured veterans’ spouses without access to affordable health coverage. … Continue reading →
Ryan’s Latest Radical and Mathematically Impossible Budget Proposal
I’ve been reluctant to give Paul Ryan’s new budget proposal any mention as his proposal is so awfully mathematically flawed that it’s difficult to take the proposal seriously. Nevertheless, Ryan was a vice presidential candidate so it’s difficult to ignore … Continue reading →
Health Insurance Rate Hikes are Falling
The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services released a report last week indicating health insurance rate hikes are falling. … Continue reading →
Health Insurance Strains Family and Employer Budgets
The Commonwealth Fund demonstrates the increased dilemma of families and employers coping with rising health insurance costs. Here are five graphs demonstrating: The adverse effects of health insurance costs on family and employer budgets, The Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) impact … Continue reading →
Will Ideology Trump $100 Million a Year in Florida?
Will Florida’s Governor turn down $100 million a year because of ideology which opposes Obamacare? Georgetown University’s Health Policy Institute report demonstrates that Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion would save Florida about $100 million each year while extending health coverage to those who need … Continue reading →
More Evidence on the Effect of ObamaCare on State Budgets
Study: Expanding Medicaid under ObamaCare Yields a $5 Return for Each 1$ Invested In “Are Expanded Medicaid Costs to the States Unreasonable?” I referenced Annie Lowry’s, study on how the Affordable Care Act (aka ObamaCare), focusing on Medicaid, might effect state … Continue reading →
Is ObamaCare “The Largest Tax Increase in History?”
It’s often said that ObamaCare is the “largest tax increase in history.” The evidence suggests otherwise. Austin Frakt at the Incidental Economist utilized Kevin Drum’s data to produce the following chart, depicting ObamCare in the bottom six revenue increasing pieces … Continue reading →
What are the Effects of Repealing ObamaCare for Medicare Solvency and Its Impact on Beneficiaries?
Kaiser Family Foundation has examined the implications of repealing the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare). This is one of the best summaries I’ve read. Here are their findings, quoted at length: How would repealing the ACA affect Medicare spending and … Continue reading →
ObamaCare Repeal Accelerates Medicare Insolvency to 2016 and Other Adverse Effects
What would happen if ObamaCare is repealed? Repealing Obamacare will: 1. Increase costs for seniors, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. 2. Deny seniors important health benefits, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. 3. Result in moving up the insolvency of Medicare … Continue reading →
Romney’s Preexisting Conditions Plan Would Leave Out 89 Million Americans
After a confusing 24 hours the Romney campaign clarified his ever-changing position on preexisting conditions: Governor Romney now supports coverage for preexisting conditions for people who have had continuous coverage. The continuous coverage stipulation is extremely important as the Commonwealth Fund estimates … Continue reading →
Are Expanded Medicaid Costs to the States Unreasonable?
What’s next in the health care debate? If you listen to some Governors they are threatening, based on the Supreme Court decision, to opt out of Medicaid provisions of the Affordable Care Act (aka ObamaCare). Each state has the to … Continue reading →
Pants on Fire: “ObamaCare is the Largest Tax Increase in History”
It’s only been a few days since the Supreme Court found the individual mandate constitutional because Congress has the power to tax. It didn’t take long for the “spin maestros” to label ObamaCare as the “biggest tax increase in American … Continue reading →