Verified: 400 Wealthiest Americans Have a Greater Combined Net Worth than the Bottom 150 Million Americans

For the past couple months I have seen many quotes indicating the 400 wealthiest Americans have a greater combined net worth than the bottom 150 million Americans. However, I couldn’t find an authoritative confirmation of the assertion until last night. PolitiFact confirmed the assertion through three renowned experts in the field: Thomas Piketty of the Paris School of Economics, Emmanuel Saez of the University of California, Berkeley, and Daniel Mitchell of the libertarian Cato Institute.

Just think about it: 400 people have greater combined net worth than the bottom 150 million Americans! One really needs to believe in the “Great Man Theory” to justify that kind of net worth distribution.

In the context of today’s debates concerning shared sacrifice for the betterment of society it is noteworthy to quote Adam Smith:

“It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more in proportion.”

Other inequality measures document the widening of inequality in America:

  • The top 1 percent of Americans possess more wealth than the entire bottom 90 percent.
  • Fom 2002 to 2007, 65 percent of economic gains went to the richest 1 percent.
  • The Gini coefficient, a measure of inequality, continues to grow in America, placing the United States as more unequal a society than either Ghana or Egypt. The CIA World Factbook ranks societies by income distribution using the Gini coefficient. The closer the Gini coefficient is to zero the more equal the society. On the other hand, the closer the Gini coefficient is to one the more unequal the society.
Rank Country Gini
1 Namibia 70.7
2 South Africa 65
3 Lesotho 63.2
4 Botswana 63
5 Sierra Leone 62.9
6 Central African Republic 61.3
7 Haiti 59.2
8 Colombia 58.5
9 Bolivia 58.2
10 Honduras 57.7
11 Guatemala 55.1
12 Brazil 53.9
13 Thailand 53.6
14 Hong Kong 53.3
15 Paraguay 53.2
16 Chile 52.1
17 Mexico 51.7
18 Panama 51
19 Papua New Guena 50.9
20 Zambia 50.8
21 Swaziland 50.4
22 Costa Rica 50.3
23 Gambia 50.2
24 Zimbabwe 50.1
25 Dominican Republic 48.4
26 Peru 48
27 Singapore 47.8
28 Madagascar 47.5
29 Nepal 47.2
30 El Salvador 46.9
31 Ecuador 46.9
32 Rwanda 46.8
33 Malaysia 46.2
34 Argentina 45.8
35 Philippines 45.8
36 Mozambique 45.6
37 Jamaica 45.5
38 Bulgaria 45.3
39 United States 45
40 Cameroon 44.6
41 Iran 44.5
42 Cambodia 44.4
43 Uganda 44.3
44 Macedonia 44.2
45 Nigeria 43.7
46 Guyana 43.2
47 Nicaragua 43.1
48 Kenya 42.5
49 Burundi 42.4
50 Uruguay 42.4
51 Russia 42.2
52 China 41.5
53 Cote d’Ivoire 41.5
54 Senegal 41.3
55 Venezuela 41
56 Morocco 40.9
57 Turkmenistan 40.8
58 Georgia 40.8
59 Sri Lanka 40.3
60 Mali 40.1
61 Tunisia 40
62 Jordan 39.7
63 Turkey 39.7
64 Burkina Faso 39.5
65 Guinea 39.4
66 Ghana 39.4
67 Israel 39.2
68 Mauritius 39
69 Malawi 39
70 Mauritania 39
71 Portugal 38.5
72 Moldova 38
73 Yemen 37.7
74 Lithuania 37.6
75 Vietnam 37.6
76 Japan 37.6
77 Tanzania 37.6
78 Indonesia 36.8
79 Uzbekistan 36.8
80 India 36.8
81 Laos 36.7
82 Mongolia 36.5
83 Benin 36.5
84 New Zealand 36.2
85 Bosnia and Herzegovina 36.2
86 Latvia 35.7
87 Algeria 35.3
88 Albania 34.5
89 Egypt 34.4
90 Poland 34.2
91 United Kingdom 34
92 Niger 34
93 Azerbaijan 33.7
94 Croatia 33.7
95 Switzerland 33.7
96 Kyrgyzstan 33.4
97 Bangladesh 33.2
98 Greece 33
99 France 32.7
100 Taiwan 32.6
101 Tajikistan 32.6
102 Canada 32.1
103 Spain 32
104 Italy 32
105 Timor-Leste 31.9
106 Estonia 31.4
107 South Korea 31.4
108 Romania 31.2
109 Netherlands 30.9
110 Armenia 30.9
111 Pakistan 30.6
112 Australia 30.5
113 European Union 30.4
114 Montenegro 30
115 Ethiopia 30
116 Kosovo 30
117 Ireland 29.3
118 Cyprus 29
119 Denmark 29
120 Slovenia 28.4
121 Serbia 28.2
122 Belgium 28
123 Iceland 28
124 Ukraine 27.5
125 Belarus 27.2
126 Germany 27
127 Finland 26.8
128 Kazakhstan 26.7
129 Austria 26
130 Slovakia 26
131 Luxembourg 26
132 Malta 26
133 Czech Republic 26
134 Norway 25
135 Hungary 24.7
136 Sweden 23

Below is a graph depicting increasing household income inequality in the U.S. from 1967 to 2010, as revealed in the trend line of the Gini coefficient. (I downloaded the original data from the Census Bureau.)

Gini coefficient US 1967-2010Why does inequality matter? Here are a three posts dealing with that subject:

If you are interested in trends and levels of inequality in America I have already posted that evidence here: Introduction: Rising Inequality in America, as well as in other related posts:

This entry was posted in Income Distribution, Inequality and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>