More Jobs through Lower Tax Rates? A Look at the Evidence

Do lower top marginal tax rates create more jobs? The following evidence does not support that proposition. Here’s a graph of historical top marginal tax rates (red line, scale on the right axis) and unemployment rates (blue line, scale on left axis).

Relationship Between Top Marginal Tax Rates and Unemployment
When marginal rates were relatively high, unemployment is low. When marginal rates are relatively low, unemployment is high. If the theory of high tax cuts worked to produce jobs it would be fine with me, but the evidence doesn’t support the theory.

I ran a zero-order correlation between unemployment and top marginal rates, r = -.32, suggesting an inverse relationship. That is, when marginal tax rates are high unemployment is low. Lagging the variables didn’t produce any appreciable change in interpretation.

Here’s a graph depicting the ‘line of best fit’ between unemployment rates and top marginal tax rates.

Line of best fit - tax rates and unemployment rate.Adjusted R2 is only .089 suggesting the two variables share little variance. The model is statistically significant, Prob > F =  0.0108.

So, where are the facts supporting the proposition that lowering marginal tax rates is an effective strategy for “job creation?”

Related posts

Do Tax Cuts and Trickle Down Economics Work for America?

Do tax cuts lead to robust economic growth and greater prosperity for all? According to trickle down economics the answer is in the affirmative. Trickle down economics, often identified with supply side economics, represents the idea that tax cuts or … Continue reading →

Taxes in 11 Charts

Here’s a shout out to a must read article in the Atlantic, How We Pay Taxes: 11 Charts. Here are a couple teasers. What are the sources of federal revenue? In comparison to other countries do Americans pay a lot … Continue reading →

Big Tax Breaks for Big Companies a Big Problem, Say Small Businesses

Listening to some politicians would lead one to believe that all businessmen are opposed to closing loopholes, giving businesses extraordinary tax breaks. According to a survey by American Sustainable Business Council, Main Street Alliance and the Small Business Majority this … Continue reading →

Johnston: “9 Things The Rich Don’t Want You To Know About Taxes”

Election seasons are characterized by enormous discussions about taxes. I’m not a tax expert so I find it difficult to know who to believe. In cases like this I tend to rely on authoritative sources who have recognition in the … Continue reading →

Debunking Tax Cuts, Inequality and Economic Growth Myths

It is often stated that tax cuts for the wealthy are unrelated to economic inequality and that tax cuts for ‘job creators’ produce economic growth. Major conclusions from very prominent researchers (Piketty, Saez, & Stantcheva, 2011) debunk conventional wisdom and … Continue reading →

Another Corporate Tax Myth Exposed

Conventional wisdom suggests firms, acting rationally, are responsive to corporate tax rates and will therefore invest in countries with lower tax rates. This phenomenon is sometimes referred to as “race to the bottom.” Does empirical evidence support this conventional wisdom? … Continue reading →

U.S. Effective Corporate Tax Rates are not Higher than EU Rates

A study from University of Michigan Law School examines taxes paid by the 100 largest European multinationals compared to the effective tax rates of the largest 100 U.S. multinationals and finds the American companies pay lower rates, not higher. Here’s … Continue reading →

Effective Corporate Tax Rate at Historic Low Levels, 12.6%

Newly released data from the Congressional Budget Office demonstrates the overall corporate tax rate in 2011 dropped to 12.1%, the lowest recorded level during the 40 years of collecting such data. This effective tax rate is less than half the … Continue reading →

New Report: Corporate Tax Dodging in the Fifty States, 2008-2010

Previously I have written a few articles on corporate tax rates: Corporate Tax Rate Nonsense and Justified Outrage Study: 78 of 280 Corporations Paid a Tax Rate of Zero or Less Unemployment, Corporate Profits and the Proposed ‘Tax Holiday’ Is … Continue reading →

Corporate Tax Rate Nonsense and Justified Outrage

My ‘robotic’ news filters have identified a huge number of articles arguing for lowering corporate tax rates, ostensibly to grow the economy and create jobs. Let me first say I am not opposed to corporate profits. A good case can … Continue reading →

Study: 78 of 280 Corporations Paid a Tax Rate of Zero or Less

Citizens for Tax Justice in a study, “Corporate Taxpayers and Corporate Tax Dodgers, 2008-2010”, found: 280 of the nation’s most profitable companies paid an average tax rate of 18.5 percent from 2008 to 2010, less than half of the 35 … Continue reading →

Journalism, Tax Increases and the Richest 400

Tonight, in a response to a journalist’s question, I heard a politician make two statements that I decided to check for factual confirmation. The two statements follow with the evidence I found. I conclude with a question for journalists. Statement … Continue reading →

Corporate Advocacy Group Misrepresents Research on Effects of Tax Cuts

David Kay Johnston explains how a group of corporations desiring to lower the tax rate misrepresents research for their own purposes: The RATE Coalition, a group of 23 businesses and two trade associations, is among leading advocates for a cut … Continue reading →

Are Federal Taxes at Historically High Rates?

Listening to cable television one definitely hears complaints, especially from politicians, that taxes are at historically high levels. Whether taxes are high or not is a subjective judgement open to legitimate debate but whether taxes are historically high or not … Continue reading →

This entry was posted in Economy and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to More Jobs through Lower Tax Rates? A Look at the Evidence

  1. Todd says:

    When you run, you get tired, so you stop running. So is being tired the result of stopping? It may not be causality but actually an affect it had over time. Therefore, lowering tax rates may in fact decrease unemployment.

    • Michael Morrison says:

      If so, why did Reagan’s economic advisor, Feldstein, find in 1989 that lower tax rates were not responsible for the economic gains observed in Reagan’s Administration? In 1989, they were surprised to read in their own data that the recovery that began in 1983 had been caused mainly by an expansionary monetary policy. (To a lesser extent, it had come from growth in business investment after changes to corporate taxes in 1981.) Feldstein and Elmendorf pointed out that the recovery had not been caused, as was popularly thought at the time, by reductions in the personal income tax rate.

      That is: As early as 1989, Reagan’s economics guy did not find any evidence that the Reagan recovery had come from the Reagan administration’s personal income tax cuts.”See:

  2. elysia says:

    I don’t know much about running tests to prove correlation, so I’m confused on one thing. Does your r=-.32 mean that it is correlation? Or does that mean that it is not correlation, therefore being causation?

    • Michael Morrison says:

      Correlation coefficients vary between plus 1 and minus 1. A positive coefficient indicates a direct relationship: As one variable increases so does the other. A negative correlation coefficient indicates an inverse relationship: As one variable increases the other decreases. Correlation by itself does not, using you words, “prove” causality. That’s an entirely longer and complicated discussion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *