A new analysis by David Berliner argues the best way to improve educational outcomes is to provide opportunities for students’ families to earn liveable wages. While I think he’s got most of it right, one cannot deny the need for legitimate educational reform at both the secondary and postsecondary levels.
Effects of Inequality and Poverty vs. Schooling on America’s Youth
Background/Context: This paper arises out of frustration with the results of school reforms carried out over the past few decades. These efforts have failed. They need to be abandoned. In their place must come recognition that income inequality causes many social problems, including problems associated with education. Sadly, compared to all other wealthy nations, the USA has the largest income gap between its wealthy and its poor citizens. Correlates associated with the size of the income gap in various nations are well described in Wilkinson & Pickett (2010), whose work is cited throughout this article. They make it clear that the bigger the income gap in a nation or a state, the greater the social problems a nation or a state will encounter. Thus it is argued that the design of better economic and social policies can do more to improve our schools than continued work on educational policy independent of such concerns.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question: The research question asked is why so many school reform efforts have produced so little improvement in American schools. The answer offered is that the sources of school failure have been thought to reside inside the schools, resulting in attempts to improve America’s teachers, curriculum, testing programs and administration. It is argued in this paper, however, that the sources of America’s educational problems are outside school, primarily a result of income inequality. Thus it is suggested that targeted economic and social policies have more potential to improve the nations schools than almost anything currently being proposed by either political party at federal, state or local levels.
Research Design: This is an analytic essay on the reasons for the failure of almost all contemporary school reform efforts. It is primarily a report about how inequality affects all of our society, and a review of some research and social policies that might improve our nations’ schools.
Conclusions/Recommendations: It is concluded that the best way to improve America’s schools is through jobs that provide families living wages. Other programs are noted that offer some help for students from poor families. But in the end, it is inequality in income and the poverty that accompanies such inequality, that matters most for education.
To read the complete article click here.
For as long as I can remember, in fact going back to my first year of teaching, I have been an advocate for the important but often ignored role of student background effects on learner outcomes. The purpose of this advocacy was not to excuse teachers or schools for less than desired educational outcomes … Continue reading →
The Brookings Institution finds a correlation between housing costs and high-scoring public schools. Across the 100 largest metropolitan areas, housing costs an average of 2.4 times as much, or nearly $11,000 more per year, near a high-scoring public school than …Continue reading →
In previous articles I have posted evidence suggesting that schools and teachers are often held accountable for less than … Continue reading →
High school graduation rates are getting a lot of attention for obvious reasons — national competitiveness being one primary reason. Educational reformers are proposing numerous well-intentioned policies and strategies to improve state and local graduation rates. Many of these proposals … Continue reading →
Inequality of educational outcomes begin early in life. The following bar chart depicts pre-school vocabulary gaps between children from low and high income homes at age 4/5 in terms of months of development, according to a study by Waldfogel & Washbrook (2012).
America’s income gap is really an education gap.